Permits, inspections, findings and follow-up records
Entry dates: Jul 23, 2021 – Sep 15, 2026
THE PEOPLE, THE DATES, THE PAPER TRAIL
How the records connect.
This timeline follows Kyle Moring’s complaints and public-records requests to the City of Mount Pleasant, the City’s responses, and records obtained afterward. The central question is how the City’s statements compare with the documented record.
Compare what officials said with the source evidence, their explanations, and what remains unresolved. The records are presented so readers can assess their consistency, transparency and handling for themselves.
Follow the agency referrals and responsibility statements ↗
Follow related records from DSHS, Titus CAD, TCEQ, Titus County and other agencies ↗
206dated entries58connections8issue strands
Compare DTRG and Webster’s statements with the source pages ↗
Agency activity, RMS records and City–DA calls: compare the dates and their limits ↗
Filter by issue, person or date
16 of 58 connections · 206 matching dated entries
Walmart, inspections & permits
State inspections and distinct complaint dispositions
Entry dates: Jun 29, 2023 – Sep 3, 2026
Asbestos responsibility: permit conditions, revised application and proposed response
Entry dates: Jun 27, 2025 – Sep 3, 2026
Pilgrim’s, odor & wastewater
Citizen odor reports, City responses and the wastewater relationship
Entry dates: Jun 27, 2025 – Feb 6, 2026
October events & internal directions
Do not respond to the identified TLE follow-up
Oct 8, 2025
CT, body-camera files and same-day RMS activity
Entry dates: Oct 22, 2025
Complaint referred for state/local routing
Entry dates: Oct 20, 2025 – Oct 27, 2025
Records, formats, fees & certifications
Saved complaint confirmations compared with the City’s reply
Entry dates: Jul 25, 2025 – Sep 22, 2025
Internal ordinance correspondence, later production and notice
Entry dates: Nov 26, 2025 – Mar 21, 2026
Seven distinct signed Open Records Division certifications
Entry dates: Oct 22, 2025 – Apr 27, 2026
Moring and Walmart: instructions, no-records replies, screenshots and the rerun
Entry dates: Jul 15, 2025 – Sep 18, 2026
Council, meetings & follow-through
Repeated escalations, meeting appearances and preservation requests
Entry dates: Dec 2, 2025 – Sep 16, 2026
December–February: public remarks, submitted evidence and meeting follow-through
Entry dates: Dec 2, 2025 – Feb 18, 2026
OAG, DA & disclosure concerns
OpenGov, Schneider, LES and police-report concerns notified
Entry dates: May 28, 2026 – Sep 17, 2026
Call-log timing comparisons
Office-number matches; call contents unknown
September–November 2025 · October 21 comparison
Dayton & City property context
Separate historical administrative reports compared with later statements
Entry dates: Jul 20, 2021 – Feb 18, 2026
A CLOSING QUESTION · AUTHOR’S COMMENTARY
Who reviews the response?
When the same institution controls a search, explains its results and closes a complaint about those results, who independently checks the answer? When responsibility moves from one office to another, who is accountable for providing a documented decision?
Meaningful oversight should not depend on a resident’s ability to hire an attorney or navigate a complex records system. It should address the specific concerns raised, explain its conclusions and identify the records supporting them. Read the responses and evidence here, then decide whether that standard has been met.
These questions concern the specific statements, responses and records linked on this page.
Compare the statements and supporting records ↗