Application and supporting records · TCEQ-WW10
Southwest plant application submission and agency screening
Selected application-submission correspondence and agency screening records. Submission and administrative screening do not establish substantive approval, complete procedural compliance or native attachment identity.
Source pages 341–354, 370–376, 378–379 · 23 source pages · Selected records
About this selection
These pages come from the 688-page TCEQ production for the Southwest wastewater plant. Page labels below identify the original production; selected source images and existing redactions are preserved.
Reading context and source notes
The selection contains the signed April 28, 2023 application letter, cover and contents, initial City Core Data Form, May receiving-water and routing forms, complete nine-page administrative checklist, and June–July fee correspondence.
The initial City form has blank customer fields; the checklist identifies incomplete information. Revised forms appear in TCEQ-WW02. The checklist records $546.80 owed and the July 18 reply confirms payment and further processing; these are historical entries, not a current debt.
Blank checkboxes do not prove an omitted review. The May 4 form says no new receiving-water assessment is required and refers to an earlier review and unchanged outfall; it is not a blanket compliance finding. A partly missing year digit beside the City signature is not reconstructed.
The source order is 376, 378–379, 373–375, 370–372, 346–354, 341–345. Email blackouts, repeated contact details, mobile numbers and check numbers are masked; other signatures, amounts and dates remain. Listed attachments and FTP upload are source statements, not matched native files.
Jump to a source page
Related records
Read comments alongside the agency’s response and distinguish submission, screening, notice instructions, publication records and final action. Paired language versions and correction correspondence remain distinct. Routing sheets, blank forms and returned-mail records do not by themselves resolve delivery or procedural sufficiency.
