TCEQ · Southwest wastewater treatment plant
Issued and historical permits, agency reviews, application records and public notices—presented with their source dates, qualifications and approved privacy treatment.
Read each version on its own terms. Applicant requests, draft recommendations and issued requirements are different records. They do not by themselves establish current compliance, successful service or present facility conditions.
All 688 pages were reviewed. The 40 listed exclusions and 231 pages in three private reference sets remain outside this selection. Read why the 40 pages were excluded.
Source-page numbers below refer to this 688-page production. Other productions and selected PDFs use their own pagination. Follow each source’s date and page label.
Read the application’s historical owner and operator fields and the supplied agreement beside the City budget and the later TCEQ order. These records use different dates and descriptions; they do not establish a later title transfer or the present status of the agreement.
Compare the 2018 and March 2026 terms with the existing Southwest excerpt and the separate City Southside permit. EPA monitoring results and the September 2026 order concern identified reporting periods; requirements, reported results and settled allegations are different evidence. The issued record’s 94%/98% WET discrepancy remains visible.
The application, models, sampling-waiver correspondence, maps and photographs explain what was submitted and reviewed. Compare them with the issued terms and separately dated monitoring records. An application-sampling waiver is not a waiver of routine permit monitoring; models, applicant estimates and source captions do not establish measured performance or current conditions.
Read comments alongside the agency’s response and distinguish submission, screening, notice instructions, publication records and final action. Paired language versions and correction correspondence remain distinct. Routing sheets, blank forms and returned-mail records do not by themselves resolve delivery or procedural sufficiency.
33 of 33 records
No matching records. Try another phrase or clear the filters.
Permit issued March 20, 2026, with the March 27 action notice, as contained in the agency production. The issued-permit WET heading on source 62 says 94%, while its rows/footnote and printed page 20 use 98%. Preserve both; do not silently select one value. Requirements are not measured performance.
Agency production pages 5–6, 60–99
Historical 2018 permit from the agency production. Its conductivity table states three samples per week; the 2026 issued table states one per week. Other parameters require separate comparison. Permit terms are not measured discharge results.
Agency production pages 100–139
Selected application records describing ownership and operating roles at the Southwest plant. Historical application statements; do not assert current ownership, current contract status or equivalence of all registry names/addresses.
Agency production pages 321–328, 380, 388–389
Agency response to public comments and associated filing records from the permit file. Attribute conclusions to the agency response; distinguish comment allegations, agency answers and independently established facts.
Agency production pages 26–33
Selected correspondence concerning Spanish-language notice preparation and publication. Correspondence does not establish translation equivalence or full notice compliance; later reviewed English/Spanish wording differs.
Agency production pages 34–38, 43–46, 50–52
May 15, 2025 draft-permit fact sheet, supporting appendices and selected review letters. Draft-stage record. Ammonia, phosphorus, WET, order-status, exceedance-period and TDS discrepancies remain unresolved. EPA receipt/approval is not established by its cover.
Agency production pages 226–268
Selected agency technical-review memoranda, modeling revisions and related correspondence. Distinguish proposed/modeling values from final permit terms and observed conditions. Native email attachment identity remains unestablished.
Agency production pages 275–286, 288–289, 292–300
Selected application-classification records and public notices. Keep major-amendment/renewal wording tied to each version. This selection does not establish newspaper publication or native attachment identity.
Agency production pages 304–311, 316–319, 336–338, 340
Selected application-submission correspondence and agency screening records. Submission and administrative screening do not establish substantive approval, complete procedural compliance or native attachment identity.
Agency production pages 341–354, 370–376, 378–379
Application-sampling waiver request and agency correspondence. The grant covers two Table 2 metals samples and one Table 3 organics sample. This is not a waiver of routine permit monitoring; inconsistent table notes and sampling dates elsewhere remain unresolved.
Agency production pages 680–682
Application maps and flow schematic, as produced by the agency. Drawing dates, estimates and source qualifications remain part of the record; these documents do not independently establish current or as-built conditions.
Agency production pages 452, 454, 456, 459, 688
Applicant chemical-use summaries and laboratory assignments submitted with the application. These are qualified applicant estimates and assignments, not measured effluent results or verification of current use, accreditation or chain of custody.
Agency production pages 675–676, 678
Paired English and Spanish application notices. The descriptions differ in detail, including monitoring reductions and flow. They are presented as distinct source versions without a finding of translation equivalence or publication.
Agency production pages 198–203
Historical operating/permitting agreement and payment schedule from the application file. Document labels, term, fax, receipt and schedule dates remain distinct; this record does not establish current contract status or payment.
Agency production pages 463–469
Paired decision notices and response-to-comments access sheets from the permit file. These historical procedural notices distinguish the decision from authorization to construct or operate. They are not current deadline guidance.
Agency production pages 17–24
English and Spanish preliminary notices describing the proposed amendment and draft review. Their wording differs, and requested changes are not necessarily final permit terms. No certified language equivalence or delivery finding is made.
Agency production pages 154–159
Administrative-completeness declaration and historical publication instructions. The declaration records May 1, 2023 receipt and August 1 completeness; a July 24 date elsewhere remains a record variation. Screening and instructions do not prove substantive approval or completion of notice.
Agency production pages 209–214
Applicant public-involvement screening form, including its conditional instructions and blank continuations. Responses are applicant statements; blank later sections do not establish that no notice, meeting or outreach occurred.
Agency production pages 408–411
Technical application report in agency production order, with its tables, footnotes and pagination gaps. Treatment and sampling statements remain applicant-supplied; differing sample windows and one-sample/two-sample notes remain unresolved. These are not independent compliance findings.
Agency production pages 413–449
Captioned facility and receiving-water photographs with their attachment dividers. Captions are source assertions; receipt stamps do not establish photograph dates. Visible foam does not establish its chemical identity, cause or compliance significance.
Agency production pages 470–471, 686–687
Administrative application with its certifications, summaries and template context. Apparent signature/notary date differences remain visible. Applicant requests do not establish which reductions were granted; the fictional example is not facility evidence.
Agency production pages 381–401
Historical operator core-data form and divider. Printed roles, identifiers and dates are preserved as applicant-supplied information, without verification of current ownership, registry accuracy or operations.
Agency production pages 402–405
Supplemental permit information form and adjacent maps. Form and map receipt markings, figure references and placeholders remain distinct. Related maps and photographs appear in PLAN-C and PLAN-L; those links do not prove separate submission or distribution.
Agency production pages 355–358
July 2025 publication-correction correspondence and associated affidavit forms. The agency requested correction of an alternative-language affidavit on an Air form. Replies, repeated emails and notarization dates are not separate publication events or proof that every requirement was satisfied.
Agency production pages 141–147
Draft-stage transmittal and complete notice-of-application/preliminary-decision instructions. These historical directions concern a preliminary decision and do not establish final permit terms or completion of publication and service.
Agency production pages 149–153
Spanish action notice describing executive-director action effective March 20, 2026. It complements the English notice in WW05; its procedural wording is historical, without a certified translation, delivery or current-deadline finding.
Agency production pages 7–8
File-control and routing sheets, March 27, 2026 transmittal and a public comment. Administrative dates and the transmittal’s wording remain as recorded. The commenter’s allegations are attributed statements, not independently established discharge or causation findings.
Agency production pages 1–4, 11, 13
June–July 2025 notices, publication records and verification forms. Earlier and corrected versions remain distinct. An Air-permitting form heading, an undated verification field and conditional pages are retained without a legal-sufficiency conclusion; see PLAN-P for correction correspondence.
Agency production pages 40–42, 53–59, 140
Notice-routing records and February 2024 notice material. Email status, attachment lists and mailing notations show routing context, without establishing delivery or completion of every notice requirement.
Agency production pages 169–176
August 2023 publication variants and submission emails in source order. Color and monochrome variants are not separate publication events. Blank or faint date fields, place entered in a language field and handwritten identifier differences remain unresolved.
Agency production pages 179–193, 207–208
Complete English and Spanish 2023 notice variants with accompanying unexecuted forms. The descriptions differ in detail. Blank and conditional forms provide context without proving whether an action occurred.
Agency production pages 215–224
Draft correspondence, review requests and modeling memorandum. Irregular dates, placeholders and blank response fields remain visible. Model predictions and proposed limits are not measured discharge results or final approval.
Agency production pages 269–274, 290–291
Historical registry, location and plain-language summary variants. Registry labels, recorded dates and printed page order are preserved. The materials do not establish current library hours, registry accuracy or equivalence of differently named facilities.
Agency production pages 359–363, 365–366, 368–369