Corporate / ORGANIZATION IN THE RECORD
Pilgrim’s Pride
Company named in the wastewater permit materials
Pilgrim’s Pride
Linked record period: May 1, 2023 – May 1, 2023
WHY THIS PROFILE IS HERE
Role in the paper trail
Attachment A and related permit records describe the company’s relationship to the City-owned Southwest WWTP. The records do not establish the symbolic scene shown in the editorial artwork.
PUBLIC AGENCY DATA / SEPARATE SNAPSHOT
Compare the agency records
Historical name and address matches, with geography, record types and reporting limits kept visible. These totals are separate from this profile’s individually reviewed chronology.
Explore the public-data comparisons →CHRONOLOGY
Key dates & context
- Source record
TCEQ application links City ownership and Pilgrim’s operation of Southwest WWTP
The application identifies the City as owner of the facility and land and as co-applicant with Pilgrim’s Pride. Attachment A contains their 1988 Operating and Permitting Agreement, including Pilgrim’s operating obligations, City approval of capital improvements over $100,000, debt-service reimbursement, other customer connections, and a permit-transfer provision.
Context, limits & source references
The cited application and agreement establish their stated terms. They do not establish whether the agreement was later amended, what payments are current, or the outcome of a particular records request. The Southwest plant is distinct from the Southside plant.
- TCEQ technical package WQ0003017000 — PDF pp. 96, 101, 173–180; agreement signed May 4, 1988, effective June 1, 1988
- City wastewater budget excerpt — PDF p. 1, DRAFT watermark; FY26 archive label
- Titus CAD property 9270, 664 FM 127 — January 18, 2026 snapshot, PDF p. 1
Source notes
Symbolic editorial illustration; imagined objects and buildings, not official insignia or documentary evidence.
This profile is drawn from the case study’s reviewed chronology and correspondence index, through September 21, 2026. Roles identify the capacity described by the linked material; the date range is not a verified employment term.
Source statements, transcript excerpts, reported concerns, historical comparisons and timing analysis retain their separate labels. An invitation does not prove attendance. A copied recipient does not establish agreement or action. A call-number match does not establish call content.
Editorial portraits are illustrations, not documentary photographs. Original documents and recordings control over the profile summary. About the method ↗