Skip to profile
AN INDEPENDENT CASE STUDY Mount Pleasant, Texas
MOUNT COMPLACENTTHE PAPER TRAIL
← Back to Who’s Who?
Satirical editorial illustration of an imagined treatment basin with exaggerated glowing green water, bubbles and vapor; symbolic imagery for Southwest Wastewater Treatment Plant.
SATIRICAL ILLUSTRATION

City government / ORGANIZATION IN THE RECORD

Southwest Wastewater Treatment Plant

City-owned facility in the TCEQ application

Southwest Wastewater Treatment Plant

Linked record period: May 1, 2023 – May 1, 2023

Key dates ↓Related records ↓Source notes ↓

WHY THIS PROFILE IS HERE

Role in the paper trail

The application and Attachment A connect City ownership with Pilgrim’s operation of the facility. Read the permit records for the precise terms.

CHRONOLOGY

Key dates & context

  1. Source record

    TCEQ application links City ownership and Pilgrim’s operation of Southwest WWTP

    The application identifies the City as owner of the facility and land and as co-applicant with Pilgrim’s Pride. Attachment A contains their 1988 Operating and Permitting Agreement, including Pilgrim’s operating obligations, City approval of capital improvements over $100,000, debt-service reimbursement, other customer connections, and a permit-transfer provision.

    Context, limits & source references

    The cited application and agreement establish their stated terms. They do not establish whether the agreement was later amended, what payments are current, or the outcome of a particular records request. The Southwest plant is distinct from the Southside plant.

    • TCEQ technical package WQ0003017000 — PDF pp. 96, 101, 173–180; agreement signed May 4, 1988, effective June 1, 1988
    • City wastewater budget excerpt — PDF p. 1, DRAFT watermark; FY26 archive label
    • Titus CAD property 9270, 664 FM 127 — January 18, 2026 snapshot, PDF p. 1

Source notes

Satirical editorial illustration with deliberately exaggerated toxic-looking water; not evidence or a depiction of actual plant conditions.

This profile is drawn from the case study’s reviewed chronology and correspondence index, through September 21, 2026. Roles identify the capacity described by the linked material; the date range is not a verified employment term.

Source statements, transcript excerpts, reported concerns, historical comparisons and timing analysis retain their separate labels. An invitation does not prove attendance. A copied recipient does not establish agreement or action. A call-number match does not establish call content.

Editorial portraits are illustrations, not documentary photographs. Original documents and recordings control over the profile summary. About the method ↗