Wesley Lyon

CHRONOLOGY

Key dates & context

1. Feb 18, 2026Timing comparison

   February 18: higher daily activity and TCOLE-number records

   135 internal outgoing groups on the meeting date, compared with a median of 111 and range of 97–120 on eight nearby Wednesdays.

   Context, limits & source references

   The TCOLE records overlap and may be legs of one transferred call. The main number serves multiple functions; it does not identify one official. No ordering against the meeting time or subject-matter connection is established.

   • city:108053 · City of Mt. Pleasant - Call Logs from Nov 5th 2025.xlsx · Inbound Calls to Group Numbers!A11661:H11661
   • city:108054 · City of Mt. Pleasant - Call Logs from Nov 5th 2025.xlsx · User Phones - Inbnd,Outbnd,Miss!A89581:H89581
2. Feb 18, 2026Recorded conversation

   Inspection discrepancies return to the discussion

   Kyle contrasts City and DSHS inspection records, raises the October 17 agency meeting and disputes the characterization of his complaints. Vine later describes a platform migration reported to him by Lin, while expressly acknowledging uncertainty about whether missing fields, PDF conversion or absent inspector notes explain individual records. Lyon identifies code-enforcement standards as something to examine; Vine proposes an internal process review and says he will look at the points marked with red stars.

   Context, limits & source references

   The selected passages come from Moring’s recording; time marks are approximate. Vine describes possible explanations, not a technical finding about a specific missing field. The CAD permit history shows one correction but does not establish what happened to every inspection record.

   • Updated transcript, PDF pages 104–107, 112–114, 125–126, 139–143 and 159–160
3. Feb 18, 2026Recorded conversation

   Transparency assurances alongside workload and response concerns

   Vine describes the City as transparent and honest, then discusses workload and requests the City believes repetitive. Hinton says they will not tell Kyle to stop submitting requests. Vine says Kyle should at least receive a response; when Kyle says he receives only no-responsive-records answers, Vine suggests that may need to change.

   Context, limits & source references

   Quotations and times follow the saved transcript. The audio and speaker labels have not been listening-verified in this update. This records an assurance and a discussion of response practice, not a determination that a particular search was complete or that requests were legally repetitive.

   • Updated transcript, PDF pages 92–95; 01:02:19–01:04:18
4. Feb 18, 2026Recorded conversation

   “Those are not meeting those keywords”: the two search requests

   Lyon gives the keyword-search explanation, asks for correspondent/date details and raises a hypothetical possibility of more emails. Kyle says he had already supplied specific instructions. Kyle confirms this selected exchange concerns both the Moring-related and Walmart-related requests and corrects Lyon’s words to “Those are not meeting those keywords.” The January 12 native forwarding message preserves both original requests.

   Context, limits & source references

   Participant confirmation covers the selected exchange, not the entire meeting. The “hundred more emails” statement is hypothetical. Actual search correctness must be compared with the written requests and supplied queries; no missing-message count is established.

   • Updated transcript, PDF pages 11–12 and 15–17; 17:00–18:14 and 19:41–21:50
5. Feb 18, 2026Recorded conversation

   Meeting transcript records the template concerns raised with City leadership

   Kyle raises the Cibolo reply address and Beck’s estimates greeting another requester. In the participant-corrected exchange, Kyle says “That’s not good,” Vine says “Attention to detail,” Vine adds “I would agree with you on that,” and Hinton says “Yeah, 100%.”

   Context, limits & source references

   Selected quotations use approximate recording times. Template errors are documented separately and do not establish actual misdelivery or a promise to eliminate every future error.

   • February 18 Updated PDF pp. 98–99 and original recording around 1:05:38–1:06:40
   • February 18 original recording and selected transcript passages
6. Mar 17, 2026Source record

   March 17 Council presentation and agenda-item restrictions

   Lyon’s March 17 emails first limit the agenda-item discussion and say there will be no PowerPoint presentation. A later email permits a presentation coordinated through Webster, subject to the stated time and agenda limits. Kyle’s September 15 preservation request later recounts the sequence.

   Context, limits & source references

   Read the separate directions and later clarification together. The current comparison does not add fresh listening verification or a TOMA finding.

   • March 17 emails: initial directions, PowerPoint refusal and later clarification; September 15 preservation request
7. October 16, 2025–August 6, 2026Source record

   Council escalations counted from the original mailbox

   146 distinct outgoing emails to the Mayor or a Council member were reconciled to original mailbox bytes using SHA-256, Message-ID, date and actual recipient headers. The retained classification contains 28 action requests, 6 governance notices and 112 records/administrative exchanges.

   Context, limits & source references

   Message identity and availability are verified. The retained classification is an analytical scheme, not a new attachment-by-attachment adjudication. Reading copies select text and omit attachments. This does not prove delivery, reading, nonresponse or the truth of allegations. The count spans October 16, 2025–August 6, 2026; the export ends August 15.

   • Original mailbox messages and retained Council register; 146/146 identity checks passed.
8. Sep 15, 2026Author’s account

   Two Council appearances and the interrupted budget remarks

   The timestamped links in Kyle’s same-week media emails identify 13:55–16:49 public comment and 28:21–31:03 budget remarks. Kyle reports the cutoff, microphone switch-off and threatened police escort; he says he was not escorted out.

   Context, limits & source references

   The linked passages include Moring’s remarks and the officials’ responses. Lyon’s quiet remark around 14:11–14:13 remains unintelligible. The prepared speech is separate from the delivered words; overlapping speech and microphone operation are not fully established by the excerpts.

   • September 15 Council-links and prepared-speech audit; KLTV/KSLA sent messages
9. Sep 18, 2026Recorded conversation

   Walmart search rerun, possible costs and dismissal discussion

   Bryan discusses changing AND to OR and anticipates more emails; Lyon discusses the parameters. Webster says an earlier OR screenshot returned the same amount, while Kyle says he has not received it. The discussion includes possible review costs, a proposed export and conditional dismissal. Those statements do not establish that the export or dismissal was completed.

   Context, limits & source references

   Compare the competing search descriptions with the saved query and delivered records. The apparent screenshot request has only uncertain gist support and is not identified as the OR screenshot. Kyle’s account of the hearing and his reasons for agreeing are separate from these non-courtroom recordings. Transcript times are approximate.

   • September 18 conversations outside the hearing; selected audio excerpts and accompanying text